- -When will I see a refrigerator in our new
kitchen?
- - This is a problem that still has no solution.
(from conversations with my husband)
Knitting is inherently full of problems. There is always
something that goes wrong even with the best patterns. Yet, years of knitting
taught me that for every problem there is a solution, and if there is not, you
can always unravel your work and start all over which could be also called a
solution albeit on a radical side.
When the idea of the Blue improvisation sweater was born I imagined
it like this.
Yes, I drew a sketch, like a real pro. Because it helped to
visualize better how I wanted my sweater to look: with a cabled body and
multicolored sleeves. Both techniques – fair isle and aran – are old and
traditional, but combined in one garment – become more modern and, dare I say,
extravagant. And almost everything went well. At least till I reached the neck
line. It turned out to be a real pain in the neck.
I followed the original directions for the Iron Work Sweater
and its neck line was too low and too wide for my liking (keep it in mind if
you decide to use this pattern!). Problem # 1. Solution - I picked up stitches
around the neckline with the leftover blue yarn and smaller needles and started
working in the round in 1x1 rib (all knit stitches through the back loop) while
gradually decreasing the number of stitches. I put all decreases around the
seams so they would look as continuation of the blue seams on the sleeves.
Unfortunately I didn’t have a lot of yarn left.
The last ball of Rowan Pure Wool 4Ply in Indigo in my possession
was of a little bit different hue (how that could happen?!). That is why I couldn’t
possibly have the turtleneck collar from my initial sketch. Problem # 2.
Solution – I turned the collar, joined the last ball, and started increasing
stitches mirroring the decreases (all the details are on my Ravelry page). There
is a visible line at the place where a new ball was attached, yet, this line is
inside the garment and no one knows about it besides me (and you).
Even though the sweater doesn’t look like on my initial
sketch, I like it. The collar is stretchy and comfortable, it is much higher
than it would have been if I followed the directions for the original pattern,
and it looks right for this particular project.
The photographs were taken on Valentine’s day. We went
boating – my husband and I, just the two of us. Funny, but for many years we
didn’t even think of celebrating such silly things as wedding anniversary or
Valentine’s day. Now, with kids gone, we are getting more and more sentimental.
Or, maybe, we appreciate more our time together, or what is left of it.
Anyway, I was very pleased with this sweater. It feels soft
and is weightless, fits me well and is warm enough. This whole experience – from
the initial idea of a mixed techniques sweater till the final result – had a
strange effect on me. It “freed” me from the directions’ constraints, so to
speak, made me realize that I can do more than just follow directions. Something
sort of snapped inside and released some creative potential that I never
suspected to be there in the first place. Like a genie was freed from a bottle.
And I started sketching, and looking for inspiration, and sketching again. That
is how at the moment I got not one but two EXTREMELY challenging projects on my
needles simultaneously.
One – a symphony of cables, big, luscious, and almost
three-dimensional. Reminds me of succulents.
Two – another asymmetrical design, with a twist.
Both are not finished yet, and I am not sure how they will
turn out. So I’d better write about them later, when they are done.
Meanwhile, I finished one little garment in between (it was
my “to go” project that I could take to the knitting group with me). To make it
I used Drops Recycled Cotton from my unraveled sweater. Why I unraveled it? I
didn’t wear it, even once. Funny, because the wool version of the same pattern
I wore so much it became almost unwearable.
I picked an old Adrienne Vittadini pattern that was made for
a winter garment. I am a big fan of Adrienne Vittadini, I used to buy her books
and yarn when she was in business. Many of her patterns are stylish, classy,
and look surprisingly modern. I made a couple of them then – not everything
worked well for me, but my experience with Vittadini certainly left me wanting more.
This particular pattern was in my mental queue for the longest time. And I
decided to try it in cotton with short sleeves – more practical for the life on
a subtropical island.
What can I say? This t-shirt fits me like a glove, goes with
everything, and will be worn a lot. And I like it. Yet, I didn’t get as much
excitement from the process of making it, or from wearing it, as I did with my
experimental blue sweater. No adrenaline rush, no jitters (Am I doing it right?
Do I need to unravel and start over again?), no decisions to make. Just follow
the pattern and enjoy the result. No fun at all.
Meanwhile my “blue” period is officially over and I don’t
have a name for the new one. Maybe “green”???
Oh, and speaking of names. Now I
got so much appreciation for people who find names for things. Like Sherwin-Williams
paint colors. There are many colors at Sherwin-Williams, and every one of them has
a name: “After the Rain”, “Blueblood”, “Hyperblue” – these are just few examples.
I would love to meet a person who came up with these names. I confess, my
imagination isn’t that wild. Actually, it stops working when it comes to naming
a project. “Blue improvisation” is no better than “blue disaster”. How to deal with this problem? I need to find a precise spot somewhere between pretentious
and bland. Or maybe the name is not that important? After all “What’s in the
name? that which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet”, right? Or, as a possible solution, just go to the Sherwin-Williams website and borrow a name there?
No comments:
Post a Comment